• 08Mar
    Categories: fashion, knit Comments: 0

    My blog posts? I think I need to do some freeing up, stretching and shaking out. Possibly focus on my breathing too. My posts are too tense, too thought out.

    Anyway. I remember a year or so ago discussion on Ravelry about “beastly” knits. Designers hating knit wear, making it look oversized, strangling, ugly. Since then, my eye has changed. My thinking too.

    For me, this is a celebration of the stocking stitch. Its right side and, cleverly, a view of the wrong side as a simple collar. It’s huge stocking stitch, magnified. So you really look at it again with fresh eyes. In striking colour that you can’t ignore.

    Oh, that giant cast on, and cast off! If you knit: how many times have you stared at those stitches, counting them? Now they’re plain for all to see, on the cuffs. And that slight sag, forming the peplum (restrained by a narrow belt, is it threaded through?)

    Too bulky? Look, if you live in a really cold climate, I’m sure most of your Winter clothes are rather bulky. Makes you look too fat? … or doll like?

    See, my eyes have changed.

    Image used for review: style.com

  • 18Feb
    Categories: Amigurumi, sewn Comments: 4

    DblCrochetI’ve taken a couple of craft classes recently: decided I’d learn something enjoyable before Uni holidays end and my mind fills up with real study. I did Beginners Crochet and Adult Sewing. Took my kid, M, along to a class for toddlers too, before her school starts. Love her swooshy painting, she had fun. Also in the photo, the double stitch crochet square I’ve finished in spare moments.

    It is lovely doing a class: being with other people excited to craft; discussing by pointing, touching and showing; hearing things you never thought to ask (machines can knit, but there are no machines that crochet, it’s always totally by hand). And it’s such a confidence boost to know most of my self-taught ways are actually the “proper” way!

    I’ll be back at my desk, in my usual creative space next week. But I must say I’ve enjoyed being out and about.

  • 10Feb
    Categories: fabric, sewn Comments: 4

    patchwork_bag_12010 is starting to feel serious: A is back at school, M’s starting soon (it’s a Montessori school) and I’ll be back at Uni before I know it. So I’d better hurry up and show you the only Christmas present I actually handmade!

    Yes, Germaine, Mum did actually ask for a handmade gift. I suspect she knows I have more fabric/time than money at the moment … And so I took the opportunity to try my first patchwork.

    The fabrics are from a charm pack: Botany by Lauren and Jessi Jung for moda. You know, I haven’t really used craft fabrics before. Admired them, yes. Stroked them on the bolt in the shops, uh, yes. But actually sewn with them? No, I’ve basically used dress fabrics: cheap or better quality.

    So this project gave me a couple of surprises. First, I’d always thought that not using craft fabrics for dressmaking was kinda snobby: it isn’t. Roll on all the designers (actually it’s not their fault), roll on all the manufacturers offering craft fabric designs on dressmaking and other types of fabric. And second, I’d thought that combining the fabrics contained in a charm pack would be kinda brainless. I mean, they’ve been specifically designed to go together, haven’t they? Well, they probably were designed to match. But I didn’t happen to like that particular fresh Spring green with that particular turquoise. Might be just me. Or might be unrealistic expectations. Any rate, I decided one side of the patchwork bags would use mainly the fresh greens; the other mixed the turquoises.

    patchwork_bag_2

    Look pretty and neat, don’t they? But they’re actually a bit wonky. I mean, I knew attaching the linings would be a problem: I’d sized them without factoring in any space needed for bulky seams, turn of cloth or any concepts like that. As a result, there’s a tuck just where the ribbons are joined. And I rather like that tuck, makes the bags a little more interesting. Next time, I’ll design in a tuck (on purpose).

    My other issue was a bit more unexpected. I’d chosen what I thought was a really simple pattern for my first patchwork: just lots of squares. Arranged in a grid. No fancy hexagons, diamonds, nothing. Just a grid. About an hour into sewing (I’m slow: I sew and think, sew more, ponder..). Anyway, about an hour into sewing I realised a grid-based pattern requires you to line things up exactly. And I couldn’t. I did try, with lots of pins. Hence my question: am I mad to worry if my patchwork is about 2mm out in places? Lots of places?

    Deep down, I know the answer. No, I should be more accurate. It’d look better. So, dear experienced patchworkers, some more questions: what should I have done? I’ll admit to treating a my fabric like paper: folding in half, scoring and cutting (with scissors). Was that my downfall? I’ll also admit my sewing may have veered from straight by about 1mm on occasion: did those slight errors multiply? Or is there some particular technique I should have known about and used?

    And yes, I did check my patchwork books, limited though my collection is. And I realised all my Japanese books are about hand patchworking. Not by machine. Even though one of them is specifically about different designs made from squares (and triangles). I also have Last-Minute Patchwork + Quilted Gifts by Joelle Hoverson which doesn’t really have a lot of grid-based designs. Perhaps so you can make them last minute, eh? And they still look good as gifts? Yes, Germaine, there’s often quite a bit of truth to what you say, however offended we get. But nine patches are a traditional grid pattern, so there must be a way to align them?

  • 04Feb
    Categories: Amigurumi, home Comments: 6

    DeskLeft002Thank you so much for your comments last week! I had fun. Mind if I do it again?

    1. Kid’s art. Still not on wall, but looking nice and colourful in the morning light.

    2. New library books. I can never borrow just one. Also, I’ve been trying to dig out all the Bendigo Woollen Mills shade cards I have – I don’t think the website does the colours any justice. And, to be honest, Bendigo’s prices are really reasonable, particularly if you have ideas involving a lot of yarn…

    3. Yes, I drew that background! (Sorry, couldn’t help myself!)

    4. Kid’s heights and other measurements, in case the sewing urge strikes. The littlest is nearly a metre tall! (She’s just turned 3.)

    5.  Chinese dictionaries, balloons, pencil case. I think this weekly showing-my-desk-thing might be good for me: I actually tidied the Christmas pudding into the storage cupboard ;-)

    6. Ideas.

    DeskRight002

    7. Went to IKEA on the weekend. You’ll be pleased to hear I bought a little bin (see 9 last week). And I bought a random orange tin I’m not sure what I’ll do with, some more kid’s bowls, some finger puppets … as well as the drawers we really went to buy.

    8. Crochet project. I’m really enjoying it.

    9. Sewing machine, still untouched.

    10. Yes, dear patient library, I will return it on time! (Hate it how the length of time you can borrow changes if someone else requests the book. Even though it’s totally fair enough, I’ve requested books too)

    11. The books mentioned yesterday.

    12. Stain on the table, although I try to be careful. Argh! (I did later manage to scrape it off)

  • 03Feb
    Categories: Amigurumi Comments: 4

    SingleCrochetSo, I’ve had to admit to myself that despite crocheting Amigurumi (several unblogged) and making a crochet scarf several times over (because I changed my mind about colours), I don’t actually know how to crochet. Or if I did once know, I’ve clearly forgotten. Crochet doesn’t feel comfortable and natural to me, the way knitting does.

    I decided I’d learn to crochet. Systematically, properly, mindfully. The right way once and for all, so that I won’t forget or get confused ever again.

    Anyway. I was following along with a pamphlet from the American School of Needlework (subtitle: “excellence in instruction”), when something just didn’t seem right … the first row (if I understood correctly) was different to all the subsequent rows. Why? I decided I’d just check with a couple more books.

    Now, I’ve always known that there are differences between US and UK crochet terminology. Doesn’t worry me. (Although it’s a little disconcerting the library has 2 basic crochet books published by Reader’s Digest, one with US and one with UK terminology, and no indication on the books which is which …)

    It wasn’t until I read Debbie Stoller’s The Happy Hooker (ISBN 978-0-7611-3985-0) that I understood what was going on. She explains crochet is a newer craft, so there really isn’t a proper, once-and-for-all-correct way to do some things. Like single (UK: double) crochet. She calls the method I was learning “not-so-technically correct”:

    “There are a good number of books that show it this way, and there are plenty of crocheters who do it this way, too-many of whom have taught themselves using these books. To crochet into the chain using the cheater’s method, simply insert your hook under only one strand of the V. It’s certainly easier to do than the other methods I’ve described, but also less aesthetically pleasing, as it can leave large loose loops…”

    I agree about the aesthetics bit. Stoller then conciliates, saying do what you like. I went back and noticed one of the Reader’s Digest books views crocheting only into the front, or only into the back of the Vs running along the top of your fabric as “variations”. I decided to try the variations. Not just for the first row, but for all rows.

    And wow, doesn’t a little change in technique make a big difference to how it looks?

    Left:

    Single (UK:double) crochet only into the back of the V. Result: distinct ridges, very stretchy, would make nice ribbing turned on the side.

    Centre:

    Single (UK:double) crochet only into the front of the V. Result: alternating rows of ridges and knots. Flatish. And not very aesthetically pleasing, in my opinion.

    Right:

    Single (UK:double) crochet the Stoller way, hooked under both parts of the V. Flat, knotty, a bit lacy looking.

    I’m glad I experimented. I’m planning to go further, see the effect of changing techniques in the middle of a row, or between rows. I’ll let you know ;-P